The structure of the devil
The structure of the devil. The medieval buildings, the unrivalled splendor which has been preserved to our days, and probably will for a long time to delight our descendants. It…

Continue reading →

The Colosseum - Ancient history
British archaeologists have excavated one of the graves in the Stonehenge and found the remains of the child and the stone sculpture, which can be one of the first children's…

Continue reading →



Interaction energies ” Theory and hypothesis

The history of science strongly suggests that often progress in any field is achieved by employing an entirely different science. A more thorough study of megalithic structures is also revealed unexpected results.

Earlier historians without a doubt attributed solely to the megalithic cult structures: either to places of worship or to the rudiments of ancient observatories. The reason for such CategoryName opinion was the observation by some astronomers have studied, for example, Stonehenge. And then, initially, the hypothesis N. Lokera about what Stonehenge was used for astronomical observations was interpreted by the archaeologists very hostile. Because such findings did not fit into the stereotypes — which could be “astronomical observations” of people who had no written language and lachiusa miserable existence.

Indeed, the artefacts in the burial ground found by archeologists near the British megaliths, to put it mildly, not dazzling. Primitive digging antler, stone mallets, crudely fashioned pots of burnt clay indicate that their owners are all these “windmillhill”, “binary” and other tribes (the names they came up with archaeologists themselves), who lived in the British Isles in the era of construction of Stonehenge, were engaged in hunting, fishing and gathering. What a Grand the buildings, and astronomical observations can there be?

However, the idea Lokier was attractive and there are new studies of megaliths. The greatest resonance was caused by research j. Hawkins. He even figured out by the computer matches the location of the pairs of the stones of Stonehenge on the ground and the astronomical directions (the points of sunrise and sunset, Ilona, the location of some of the planets, etc.). Although such studies and met the archaeologists are skeptical, study all-iaki continued. And similar structures, arranged even more simply (like stone circles, etc.) and approximately the same age (according to scientists) quite a lot — only in Ireland and the UK there are about 900. In addition, there are megaliths and other type type than Stonehenge (the combination of community and individual menhirs, spirals, etc.), in geometry, which was clearly present some kind of regularity. And their location is also associated with astronomical objects (Moon, Sun, planets, etc.).

It seemed to be, after many disputes on the appointment of megalithic structures, all “settled down” and astronomers archeologists came to ustrahivaemy all compromise on religious use of megaliths, but this version (hypothesis) there were skeptics. Interested in “astronomical” hypothesis, they conducted test calculations, in which it was found that for astronomical observations ought not such a grandiose and complex work (to break down, transport and install tens of thousands of tons of stone). To bind (“marking”) is not necessarily to have as many “flies” (far sight). This “stone palette” from which to extrapolate observations of the moon could be many times less with the same accuracy of calculations.

There is a reasonable question: “For what, in fact, was intended then megalithic structures?”. The question arose not from the simple. If scientists have the assumption that observations of the Sun were made for a precise definition of the agricultural work (early sowing, harvesting, etc.), then this assumption is quite reasonable observation: for the farmer such “accuracy” is not important, much more important to know the weather condition and soil as these factors may vary annually in relation to the astronomical dates within not only days but even weeks. Could it be that scientists don’t like the “remember” version “solar Observatory”.

But then the “moon version” does not look convincing. Absolutely not clear why the megalithic astronomers needed such a thorough and systematic, labor-intensive (construction of facilities) and long-term (hundreds of years) astronomical observations? These are the questions from official science has no clear answer. Has been suggested (J. Budd, for example) that the megalithic astronomers did research the subtle movements of the Sun and moon “for the sake of pure intellectual pleasure and even interest in the moon bordered them with delusions”. Naturally, this is not the answer. It’s impossible to imagine that a society (tribe) could spend such significant resources (labor) for the construction of structures only to a few priests-astronomers were able to satisfy their manic (by inheritance?) needs for observations of the moon.

We must pay tribute to George. Voodoo — he still notes that “. although it is impossible to say with any certainty that this was from the main purpose. It’s all very complex structures, much more complex than would be required if they were intended only for observing the Sun”.

There have been other studies of megalithic structures in the course of which revealed interesting facts that, for example, was put forward the hypothesis that some structures are “eelkoige stone” of the Ancients, in which implicit in (esoteric) form the encrypted complex scientific data about the Earth, Space, etc. came To this conclusion after geometric measurements of some of the megaliths. Accurate topographic chemimechanical of circles and avenues have revealed some striking osobennosti of their structure. For example, it was found that most stone circles are not perfect circle, but a much more complex figure — the so-called “flattened circles” and “egg-shaped ovals”. Amazing and what made so by the ancient builders “figures” had even specified the relationship of the lengths of the circumference to the diameter, and with an incredibly small error (up to hundredths). That is, the apparent “clumsiness” and low-tech processing facilities, it was a very accurate geometric construction.

But the mysteries of the megaliths has not ended! They continue to surprise. For example, in the study of the stone rows at Le Menec (France ), revealed that 12 stone rows, stretching for a kilometer from West to East, gradually approach each other. This convergence occurs on complex mathematical law, described by a parabolic function(!). In the middle of the rows there is a “kink”, when all the rows change direction, prism is carried out with the use of complex geometric construction. Natural changes and the height of the stones in the ranks — at the Western end of the largest stones, up to 4 meters, to the East, their height gradually sijaitsevien to 40-60 inches, then at the Eastern ends of the stones are once again higher, though inferior to the rocks at the Western end. In General, these series are lying on the ground the bars with complex geometry surface formed by vertically elements of variable height (nothing like a similar “device”?). The rows of menhirs Les Meneka from the West and photocatalytics two egg-shaped circles oriented in opposite directions with sharp ends. By the way, they differ from the ovate British circles because here the rocks are flat plates that are installed without gaps and merging into the rough wall.

Very interesting and the fact that the stone pillars-menhirs that make up the alleys, have a pointed lower end. More logical would be to set your Kameni on an extended base for greater stability, but the builders of the megaliths were squaring the lower end menstra like to see the detailed pencil, established him in that position, and the space around its base was sabotovala stones and earth (the piezoelectric effect?). By the way, R. Cutter from Germany (and we are talking more about the research in the 70-80th years of the last century) observed by another mysterious feature of these menhirs: the bottom, castrandom the end of the monoliths, always were in the land and, therefore, hidden from the eyes, it is often found engraved the figure in the form of wavy lines (technical name?).

The oldest city of the world
  As you know, the city is alive, as long as there are people, until there is the development of large fields. Cities appear and disappear, rebuilt or gradually die,…


Cyclopean structures of antiquity
  1) Fictional supernatural being of Greek mythology, symbolizing the barbarism. Depicted as giants with one eye in the middle of the forehead ( Cyclops. or rather Ciclopi means "one-eyed").…

Continue reading →